Lawmakers of the Imo State House of Assembly has raised concerns over how N460 million in its account was allegedly expended during the time of the suspended Speaker, Acho Ihim.
It was gathered, in Owerri, that the issue had caused disaffection among the lawmakers as they were still not sure how to go about the investigation.
At the last sitting of the House of Assembly where the controversial issue was extensively deliberated, it was noticed that some disagreed slightly on the report submitted by the deputy Speaker, Chika Madumere-led ad hoc committee.
The new Speaker, Chinedu Offor, resolved at the Committee of the Whole session, after listening to the arguments of his colleagues, to stand down the report with a view to revisiting the matter at a later date.
However, while some lawmakers insisted that there was need to compel former Speaker Ihim to explain what he could have done with the money in question, others said Ihim’s case would not achieve the needed results.
In the dramatic session, deputy Speaker, Madumere emphasised that “We are not saying that the former Speaker has embezzled any money but he should be bold to come out and account for it. Nobody is saying he has done anything.”
READ ALSO: Lagos Chief Judge retires
Also, the member representing Ikeduru state constituency, Uche Oguwuike, said the entitlements of about five suspended lawmakers had not been paid and for that reason, there was need to investigate the amount of money raised on the floor of the House.
According to Ogwuike, “There is a need to look into this matter. You can recall that five lawmakers were suspended and till now, their entitlements have not been paid. Therefore, the Speaker should come and tell us about the money.”
However, what looks like a softened argument came from the member representing Aboh Mbaise state constituency, Mike Iheanetu, who suggested that “a man’s hair cannot be shaved in his absence,” adding that “it would be appropriate to invite the former Speaker to hear from him.”
For the member representing Obowo state constituency, Kennedy Ibeh, “the committee which submitted the report ought to have included in their report, an analytical breakdown of their findings instead of just mentioning an amount of money.”
According to Ibeh, “such a comprehensive report would have aided extensively in the probing of the matter.”
